Yes, if it calls sh, it should only use sh features. Report a bug. Please show which line fails and if possible a way to make it sh compliant. I use ash as my /bin/sh w/o a hitch. apt has a small bug that is only cosmetic.
Torsten Hilbrich wrote: > > I recently installed an other shell than bash as /bin/sh (ash > precisly) just to test the systems behaviour and noticed that some > scripts stopped working correctly. For example, /etc/init.d/rcS had > problems executing some scripts (e.g., loading the keymap). I changed > it to be #!/bin/bash instead of #!/bin/sh. > > The problem is that sh (as link to bash) still have some more features > than the standard bourne shell (ash is the NetBSD implementation of sh > according to its description). > > Is this[1] to be considered as a bug and should I report it? > > Torsten > > Footnotes: > [1] the using of non-sh features in a script started with #!/bin/sh > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null -- ===== Linux, because I'd like to *get there* today
