Martin Bialasinski wrote: > Did you also add a routing entry for the subnet? > > route add -net 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > route -n should show a line like > > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
I was told that 2.1.x adds route entries for you. I did add one on the 2.0.x machine.
