I just got through partitioning a 9 gig disk myself.  I found that
fdisk worked better than cfdisk for me.  I rebooted after partitioning,
as suggested by the fdisk prompts.  I had no trouble making and formating
a 7 gig partition.  (I was unable to format large partitions using 
cfdisk and not rebooting)

Since you are making 5 partitions, at least one will have to be a logical
partition.  You can only have 4 physical partitions, numbered 1-4.
Logical partitions are numbered 5-8. (you can only have four of those
too).

I dont know much about logical partitions cuz I dont use them, but I think
that they have to be created from extended partitions.  cfdisk handles 
this for you transparently, but I think this is a manual operation in 
fdisk.  If it was me, I would combine the /usr and root partitions 
and save myself some head scratching.

Mike


On Mon, Aug 17, 1998 at 02:38:10PM -0400, Nebu John Mathai wrote:
> Hello,
>     I would like to install Debian 2.0 on a 3 Gig partition which I do not
> want to split
>     further.
>     1. Are the problems of possible filesystem corruption realistic?
>     2. Are there any performance losses with ext2fs on a 3 gig partition?
>     3. For a single user workstation, hooked to the internet via cable
> modem (and with
>     telnet and ftp servers enabled) would a single 3 gig partition be ok,
> or would it be wiser
>     to split it up?
>     4. Hardware-wise, are larger partitions worse on the drive than
> multiple small ones? Or
>     is the drive indifferent?
> 
> I have a single 8.4 Gig drive and I planned on having:
> 100 MB Linux root
> 2.9 Gig Linux /usr
> 100 MB Linux swap
> 3.0 Gig NT (unfortunately)
> 2 Gig FAT32 /home (common for Linux and NT)
> 
> But CFDISK would not let me parition it like this so I had to incorporate
> Linux into one
> massive 3 Gig partition.
> 
> I'd appreciate hearing from anyone who has had horrible experiences with
> filesystem
> corruption (hope not to hear from anyone, I guess).
> 
> Thanks for any help, and if this has been discussed elsewhere please point
> me to a FAQ
> and I'll shut up.
> 

Reply via email to