Quoting Liran Zvibel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > 2. Putting the swap in several different disks does make the access time > faster, but this is not the issue of RAID. RAIDs are good for their > ability to continue working even though one of the disks is not working > anymore (the RAID3 keeps an extra disk for parity bits, while the RAID5 > does it on the "regular" disks.)
You're forgetting RAID0, which stripes data across multiple drives but does not include any error-recovery. Mike Stone
