Thats sys/varargs.h Would varargs.h move between the two version of bo to hamm? This is source code to a mud that compiled fine under bo but now its having fits under hamm. I was expecting that all I would have to do is re-compile it without modifications.
Thanks for the info. Doug Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > Doug Thistlethwaite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Well, I bit the bullet and installed HAMM last night. Everything went > | pretty well with only a few error messages during the install. > | > | I have noticed that some of the include files I have been using in a C > | project are now missing. > | > | One of them is "sys/vararg.h" Which package is this in & what is the > | best way for me to figure out where these things are in the future. > > Is that vararg.h or varargs.h? If you really are talking about > vararg.h then you're probably out of luck. It doesn't seem to be on > any of my Unix boxes, e.g., Linux, SGI IRIX6.2, SunOS 4.x. > > If you meant varargs.h then it is in the base gcc package, among > others: > > % dpkg -S varargs.h > > gcc: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.3/include/varargs.h > checker: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linuxchecker/2.7.2.3/include/varargs.h > g++: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/egcs-2.90.29/include/varargs.h > > only it's not in "sys". > > You should be aware that the use of varargs.h won't necessarily be > portable because it's not ANSI. Instead you might want to look at > stdarg.h (man stdarg) which is ANSI, and see if it suits your needs. > > Gary
