Ah, yes, just figured that out...silly me, those processes don't have controlling terminals, so ya need 'x' in there. Thanks.
_____ _ | ____|(_) | _| | | | |___ | | |______/ | |__/ On Sun, 26 Jul 1998, George Bonser wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 1998, Eric wrote: > > > I don't think that using ps would show you if idled is running or not. At > > least, on my hamm system, I can't find a way to use ps to show me _all_ > > processes (including daemons). I always found this odd, since a > > home-grown Linux system that I always use does show every process when > > using 'ps aw' (even init). You could take a look at all the > > '/proc/<pidnum>/cmdline's to see if it's running. > > > > Try: > > ps ax > > or > > ps axw > > > > George Bonser > > Microsoft! Which end of the stick do you want today? > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > > -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null