also sprach Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.14.0622 +0100]: > Yep I know I've used "L" infrequently with mutt. It just so happens that > most lists, even in the Unix/Linux world use reply-to, so that feature > wasn't used /that/ much, personally, and I'm on a *fair amount* of comp > related e-mail lists.
So am I. Checking procmailrc, it's 53. And there is only 1, the Munich LUG mailing list, which uses reply-to. But it's very easy to tweak mutt to treat it just like the others... > Just maybe Debian org, should run a list like everybody else. I really > don't understand why a perfectly logical reply-to header, gets everyone's > panties in a knot. If things are going to be that way, then you will just > have to be a little more accepting of duplicate copies in your mailbox. > Sorry but that's the reality of things. <shrug> Sure. Let's not have this discussion anymore. It's been discussed to death. Note I set a reply-to on this message. > Anyway, we'll just have to "agree to disagree" I suppose. I like Debian and > it's philosophy, just one little issue of this e-mail list, bothers me, or > actually your reaction to you receiving a duplicate e-mail in your inbox - > oh yeah your signature about getting a real e-mail client to. Very > condescending. No biggie, though. I apologize. > Hopefully I helped you out, by pointing you to a good CMS, that's not *NUKE. Yes, thank you! -- Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system NOTE: The public PGP keyservers are broken! Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc
msg19119/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
