> > On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote: > > > Well for what it is worth my own opinion is that 95 just like its forbears > > is an app. loaded on dos and for this reason I think we should be talking > > about whether or not dos is a true multi-tasking OS ... It certainly is > > capable of becoming one. The question is, has it be implemented? > > Ever try Windows '98? Well, if you haven't, don't count on M$ ever > learning how to design a real operating system. Yesterday I heard a > commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses... > Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse.. > I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than > Win95.. Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste > of time and money.
OK there we are, a genuine M$-Windoze == shit thread. Cut it off please, if you want this type of discussion there are plenty news groups filled with it. Let's keep this a _useful_ list. Eric Meijer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
