(Please don't cc me on replies to mailing list posts, especially not ones that are basically unrelated to the post of mine you're replying to.)
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Jan Krupa wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Dragan Cvetkovic wrote: > > > Does this one gives you a clue? Your system can't find > > > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > > > > > > What I did on my system was to create a symlink from whatever current > > > libstdc++-libc6 so library in /usr/lib is to > > > $HOME/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 and add $HOME/lib to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > > env. variable. > > > > > > Not really a solution in a Debian way(tm), but works. > > > > Rodrigo has the right answer here. It's not so much that your solution > > Which distribution do you mean is better? What does this have to do with libstdc++? I don't mean anything about Java here, better or otherwise. > from sun j2sdk1.4.1_01 (j2sdk1.3.1) or from blackdown > j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin (j2sdk1.3.1-linux...) or from something > else? > Which is the most complete? What is the difference between j2sdk1.4.1_01 > and j2sdk-1.4.1-beta-linux-i586.bin? I haven't a clue, sorry. > What is jre for? It's the "Java Runtime Environment", with no development code. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
