Hi guys, Perhaps a "debian-pine" list is in order. :)
This whole PINE issue is getting blown way out of proportion. Debian's policy is clear. Both sides have points but I agree more that Debian should not interpret PINE's licensing in a way that would obviously be "pushing things" and that may have the potential of bringing Debian into a legal battle. IMHO, Debian's PINE maintainer made the right decision, even if it does inconvenience PINE users for a little while. However, this time of inconvenience will pass; especially as it becomes a "given" that PINE will not be distributed as it used to be. I have always respected the opinions of George and Marcus, and still do. I ask that we all just give this PINE issue a rest, at least for a little while. My middle finger is getting a callous from hitting the delete key "d" when deleting all of these PINE posts. :-) And, yes I am a PINE user. Thanks guys, -Ossama ______________________________________________________________________ Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- PGP Keys --- Public: http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/staff/othman/OO_PUBLIC.asc REVOKED: http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/staff/othman/OO_REVOKED.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
