Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > They don't even need to do that. All that is needed is for you to > view a maliciously crafted HTML page. If you don't have javascript > enabled then you would need to click on a link or submit a form as > well.
Okay. So that's an argument for changing the router's address from the default 192.168.1.1. > I just found out about the vulnerability yesterday. It first appeared on bugtraq on 18 Nov 2002. Whether that counts as "old news" or not is a matter of opinion, I suppose. Craig
msg18516/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
