On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 06:16:26PM +0000, Travis Crump wrote: > pretzalz@Pretzalz:~$ apt-cache policy libstdc++2.10 > libstdc++2.10: > Installed: 1:2.95.2-14 > Candidate: 1:2.95.2-14 > Version Table: > *** 1:2.95.2-14 0 > 700 http://http.us.debian.org testing/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 1:2.95.2-13 0 > 70 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages > > And now the reason for my post. What could have caused testing to have > a newer version of a package than unstable. From my limited > understanding this doesn't seem possible.
Something confusing is going on. -14 was in unstable, but was removed long ago (February 2001), and then seems to have been reinstated. I think an older version made it into testing in the meantime, but can't quite follow the chain of events. If I'm bored sometime I'll try to work it out. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
