Ossama Othman wrote:
> I believe that you may be incorrect. We have someone running 2.0.33 with
> SMP enabled since he has 2 Pentium II processors in his system. If you
> need SMP, you will probably have to recompile the kernel source manually.
>
> Do your make {menu,x}config (whichever you use). Then edit the top level
> makefile (usually /usr/src/linux/Makefile) and remove the SMP comments so
> that it looks like something like:
>
> #
> # For SMP kernels, set this. We don't want to have this in the config file
> #because it makes re-config very ugly and too many fundamental files depend
> # on "CONFIG_SMP"
> #
> # NOTE! SMP is experimental. See the file Documentation/SMP.txt
> #
> SMP = 1
> #
> # SMP profiling options
> SMP_PROF = 1
Correct. We have a dual p5-200 running .29.
mail~> uptime
12:18pm up 110 days, 18:58h, 3 users, load average: 0.14, 0.12, 0.12
This moves many gigs of email, and handles thousands of pop3 hits a day,
and barely breaks a sweat, while doing the other things we are using the
box for..
Tim
--
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
