On 02/09/98 at 03:20 PM, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >On Wed, Feb 04, 1998 at 09:36:06PM +0000, George R wrote:
>> That was easier than OS/2; about the same as DOS; tons easier than Win95. >> What is the fuss about? >I agree with your sentiments but I don't think this is really true. When >reinstalling my Microsoft OSs (all 3 -- DOS, 95 and NT) on Saturday >(because I bought a new disk and couldn't find any way to move NT), it >only took about 5 minutes to install 95, and there aren't any hard >questions involved, even with a custom install. Sorry you don't think it is true. I don't have Win95 at home, but the last few times I've installed/re-installed Win95, there has been at least one PNP or Win-something-or-other that didn't work just right. Had to go find this that or the other driver. You are probably using better hardware than I have at work and my friends have. I don't have any of the Win-whatevers or PNP anything. Win95 may be a 5 min install; just not on anything I've dealt with lately. Has anyone had Win95 change your CMOS settings? George Eschew obfuscation ---------------------------------------------------- reply to: grimel @icx Sorry for the trouble, I'm just getting to much spam. .net ----------------------------------------------------------- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
