Hi, On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Kirk Hilliard wrote:
> Oleg Krivosheev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Neilen Marais wrote: > > > [snip] > > > You can make sure by typing ldd /usr/bin/perl. If you see any mention > > > of libc5, you know something is causing perl to be linked to the worng > > > library.... > > > > that's the case - perl is linked against both libc6 and libc5. > > > > But i have latest perl bundle from hamm !!! > > [adduser has not segfaulted for me yet, but other Perl scripts have] i upgraded again all perl stuff last night > I also have the latest perl bundles, and I show. > > ~ $ ldd /usr/bin/perl > libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4000e000) > libgdbm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgdbm.so.1 (0x40014000) > libdb.so.2 => /lib/libdb.so.2 (0x4001a000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40028000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4002b000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40044000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) > libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x400e9000) yes, it now looks exactly the same... no libc5 dependance ADDUSER STILL DUMPS CORE !!!! > The reason that I posted this instead of just emailing Oleg is that I > hope that someone here can riddle me this: > > ~ $ ls -il /usr/bin/{perl,perl.dist,perl5.00404} > 115161 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 492108 Dec 9 20:17 /usr/bin/perl* > 115161 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 492108 Dec 9 20:17 /usr/bin/perl.dist* > 114698 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 492108 Dec 9 20:17 /usr/bin/perl5.00404* > ~ $ diff /usr/bin/{perl,perl5.00404} > ~ $ > > Why do I have two distinct copies of perl? i found this too and diffed it - no difference at all, so i don't bother very much. regards OK -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .