"E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there anything I can do to improve this situation, or is checkerg++ > not ready for prime time yet? I really think it will be a great tool > when it works.
I guess it must be the latter. As the maintainer of checker, I don't ever use C++, and don't plan to until the ANSI C++ standard comes out. I don't think it'll get fixed until I try to use it myself :-) (If you find where the bug is, let me know & I'll fix it. But there's over 300,000 lines of code in the checker package, so it's not always easy to narrow down your target.) -- Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
