Is Ultra ATA same as Ultra DMA and Ultra DMA/33 ? And if a drive is ultra DMA do I have to get a different adapter than the EIDE built into the pentium mother board ?
Chuma Tommy Lakofski wrote: > >From my experience, the CPU is still too involved in UltraDMA transfers to > offer better performance than SCSI. HD manufacturers still make their > best drives SCSI-only also AFAIK. UDMA's very cheap though. ;) > > -TL > > On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, butch wrote: > > > From: butch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 09:17:44 -0500 > > Subject: Comparison of ultra dma disks vs scsi? > > > > Hello, > > > > I have been planning to put together my ultimate linux machine and and when > > i get to the disks system there seems to be a successor to scsi for the > > ultimate price/performance. has anyone used an ultra drive and how does the > > actual perfomance compare to uw scsi? > > > > thanks, > > > > allan > > > > > > -- > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > > > --(fortune.sig)-- > "Irrationality is the square root of all evil" > -- Douglas Hofstadter > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
