On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 03:26:26PM +1000, Mark Constable wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Anyone had any problems with NT clients dialing into PPPD 2.2.0f? > > ... > It may be that the distribution has not been compiled with -DCHAPMS ? > > ---- from README.MSCHAP in pppd 2.3.1 > In short, MS-CHAP is identified as <auth chap 80> since the hex value > of 80 is used to designate Microsoft's scheme. Standard PPP CHAP uses > a value of 5. If you enable PPP debugging with the "debug" option and > see something like the following in your logs, the remote server is > requesting MS-CHAP: > > rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 80> <magic 0x46a3>] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
The PPP log indicates that the login has been successful. Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: user ptle logged in Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [PAP AuthAck id=0x1msg="Login ok"] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 203.63.216 .19> <compress VJ 0f 01>] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00 00 01>] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x4 < 12 06 00 00 00 01>] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x5 <compress VJ 0f 01> <addr 0.0.0.0> < 81 06 00 00 00 00> < 82 06 00 00 00 00> < 83 06 00 00 00 00 > < 84 06 00 00 00 00>] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x5 <addr 203.63.216 .18> < 81 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 82 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 83 06 cb 09 94 02>] Oct 28 14:55:13 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <addr 203.63.216 .19> <compress VJ 0f 01>] Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x1 < fe 02>] Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [CCP TermReq id=0x6 00 00 02 dc] Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x6] Oct 28 14:55:14 yodeller pppd[26189]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 <compress VJ 0f 01> <addr 203.63.216.18> < 81 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 82 06 cb 3f d8 13> < 83 06 cb 09 94 02> < 84 06 00 00 00 00>] [etc. This repeats] > I know you are not using CHAP and most likely just PAP but there > could be an overlap in the code. Hopefully a 2.3.2 sometime soon > might get a few of these things worked out properly. > > All this unpaid pain us Linux users go thru... buy M$ and get on > with life (not likely for me but I could hear someone saying this). Thanks for your help. Linux it is and will always be. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT. http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 58% The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
