On 21 Oct 1997, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > what you all think about creating a new libc6 Samba package without > PAM support? I am asking because the current Debian package is libc5 > based and is quite old. However, I can not release an updated libc6 > Samba package because it depends on libpam0, libpam-util and libpwdb, > which are still libc5 based. > > What I am thinking is to release a libc6 Samba package _without_ > PAM support just while the PAM libraries are updated. When this > happens I will put in PAM support in Samba again. > > I think Samba is so important that we should start testing it as soon as > possible. > > So, what are your comments? Anyone out there using PAM with Samba > seriously?
Which version of the Samba package do you call 'old'? The latest version, 1.9.17p2-0.0, was made September 28th. I wouldn't call this old. Besides, if you want a working libc6-based Samba I think you'd better try to contribute to making libc6-based PAM packages. Remco -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
