Yes, thank you. However, that would cause the "useless" creation of the .0 file because it will be nearly empty... :( each savelog would take up 2 files.
Anyone used the "logrotate" program (redhat has it) Thanks Ricardo On Sun, 5 Oct 1997, Joey Hess wrote: > Debian List wrote: > > I want to use savelog but I need the option that the .0 file created gets > > compressed immediately... Can savelog do that? > > No. However, I think if you run the same savelog command trice in a row, you > will get the effect you want. file.0 will still be uncompressed, but the logs > will be in file.1.gz . And this really shouldn't take significantly longer > than running savelog once. > > Note, though: > > BUGS > If a process is still writing to file.0, and savelog moves > it to file.1 and compresses it, data could be lost. > > So this is something you need to watch out for when running savelog twice in > a row. > > -- > see shy jo > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
