How does this differ from gcl (GNU Common Lisp)? Thanks, John Goerzen
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The new version of clisp was released today from it's upstream source. > I'm going to package it for debian, probably this weekend. If you use > clisp (or are likely to use it), please let me know if you think the > following modules are appropriate: > CLX (common lisp X-interface) > STDWIN (standard windowing toolkit) > READLINE (i'm using this instead of newreadline because it's > been better tested) > > Any opinions would be appreciated. The windowing toolkits, in > particular, seem to increase the size of the binary significantly, but > I'm assuming that if you're doing a lot of lisp development you're > probably not overly concerned with disk efficiency anyway... > > Will > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/ > > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > -- John Goerzen | Running Debian GNU/Linux (www.debian.org) Custom Programming | Debian GNU/Linux is a free replacement for [EMAIL PROTECTED] | DOS/Windows -- check it out at www.debian.org. ----------------------+---------------------------------------------- Notice: You may purchase the right to send me unsolicited commercial e-mail ("spam") for the fee of $500 (USD) per message. Billing can be either pre-arranged or can occur automatically after the reception of a spam. Failure to pay will be treated in accordance to US Code, title 47, sec. 227, which allows unsolicited e-mail to be punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss or $500, whichever is greater, per violation. Sending spam to me without payment constitutes unauthorized access to my mail daemon, which is in violation of federal law. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
