> A while ago we held a vote on the leadership of the project. The developers > strongly rejected the idea of a "Roman Senate" where all decisions would be > voted upon. They prefered to have an elected executive and ratified me to
As did I. However, I think it's slightly stretching the point to claim that "we, the developers" decided something which was an executive decision following a developer discussion with no clear consensus. Even more troubling, though, are the calls to squelch dissent because of it. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
