On Jun 23, Sudhakar Chandrasekharan wrote
> Sudhakar
> PS: Does my digital signature attachment bother folks reading this list.

Mutt doesn't know about this content-type, so I don't see it.

On Jun 24, Emilio Lopes wrote
> It's just that sometimes there is more signature than message. Pretty
> annoying, IMO.

I checked out the attachment, and it is indeed rather big. I'd recommend
using PGP/MIME (RFC2015, <URL:http://www.c2.org/~raph/pgpmime.html>) or
plain old PGP signatures; this is more compact, and probably more people
actually use it (e.g. at least three MUAs in Debian support it (mutt,
elm-me+, exmh), while I know of none that processes your format).

Ray

[PGP-signed for illustration]
-- 
UNFAIR  Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried 
to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY, 
UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS.     
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan  

Attachment: pgpDDC0ZyCb7p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to