On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:50:49PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote: > On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 13:45, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:39:25PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote: > > > Should we expect that when glibc is ready, we will be looking at an > > > apt-get upgrade for a system pinned to Testing will prove to be > 100 > > > packages? > > > > It wouldn't surprise me. There are currently 900 packages waiting for a > > fixed glibc (although they may be waiting for other things too, so take > > that figure with a pinch of salt). > > > > If aj decides to restart the testing scripts (he commented that there > > wasn't much point at the moment since glibc was stuck), a few > > documentation updates or updates to packages based on certain scripting > > languages might make it through, but that's about it. > > Ouch - my guess is that those won't all install without a dist-upgrade > to handle at least a few inter-related dependencies.
Not sure about that; I use dselect. It depends whether any package names have changed. > Does that also include gcc 3.2 recompilation of code, or is that > something else still coming down the stream? That's not here yet. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
