On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:52, Mike Dresser wrote: > On 28 Nov 2002, Richard Hector wrote: > > > You could use the linear version, where you just concatenate the > > partitions together. That shouldn't take any longer to seek over than > > one big one - each byte is still only in one place. > > > > Richard > > Well, wouldn't the raid partition be bigger than 6 gig, defeating the > whole purpose of having under 6 gig partitions?
I guess so. I was thinking, in an unclear sort of fashion, that you could fsck them seperately - but now you mention it, I suppose that's impractical. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
