On Sat, 8 Mar 1997, Bob Clark wrote: > This is *not* a flame. This list is kind of touchy lately. It's just > that I'm a big fan of bash (with vi editting mode instead of emacs) and > if there's a better shell out there I'd like to give it a try. It just > doesn't sound like zsh has anything to offer that bash doesn't.
Speed. Bash is cumbersome. But if you have the computing power it I don't see that zsh has too much else. > Comments anyone? Personally I think they should write a bourne shell in Perl (psh?). Now that could be fun. -- Brian S. Julin
