Hi, I'm using ReiserFS and I've read an article in Linux Magazine (issue october 2002 but now it's not online yet http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-10/toc.html ) And understood some things. Ext3 is a journaling patch on ext2, so the properties of ext2 could be seen in it's performance. ReiserFS is about 6 times quicker than ext2 (don't know if also than ext3) and it's size-recovery are better. On my Linux box reiserFS is doing a good job, even after a hard crash the recovery is instant (luckilly never had to recover ext2 partition). Hope I'd help someway best regards Matej
On Saturday 23 November 2002 21:40, Aedificator wrote: > What are the differences between the Ext3 filesystem and ReiserFS? Which > one is better in terms of speed, efficency ...? > > Zee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
