On Thu, 9 Jan 1997, Dr. Andreas Wehler wrote: > xemacs uses >6MB (on some other machine), emacs <2MB (on > linux). So my question: why may xemacs and emacs not be > used alternately under linux, as they play on e.g. IRIX? > > Thank you, >
The conflict merely come with 5 files: ctags, etags, emacclient, b2m and some other one I don't remember. Incredibly, although they have the same functionality, this 5 files aren't the same. The mainteners of emac, xemacs and elvis (elvis too as ctags and etags) try to convince of a way to done everything but emacs and xemacs are big and unreliable source code. This can take some time before it be done. I install emacs (after xemacs) with dpkg --force-conflict and don't have problem for the moment. I continue to experiment but I could say I didn't install anything else. I have to do this cause I'm the new auctex maintainer and I want to put both an emacs and an xemacs version of the package... I think I will put my hands too in emacs and xemacs if I could find some place in my HD. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
