>>>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 1996 13:04:18 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Some are saying that 2.0.20 may be the final 2.0 version... Does debian > already have 2.0.20 in its stable tree?
I hope that's not the case, because there are bugs in the Adaptec drivers (aic7xxx) in 2.0.20 that were introduced in 2.0.13. I know because I just tripped over them. The bugs have been reported, and I'm hoping the implementors will manage to get them fixed soon. I am unable to access MS-DOS volumes from Linux kernels later than 2.0.13. Also, there are some serious problems with module versions that were introduced in 2.0.19 and have yet to be sorted out. With all that, there will almost certainly be more versions in 2.0, and I wouldn't recommend moving forward at this point if you have a kernel that basically works. -Randy -- http://cogsci.ucsd.edu/~gobbel/ NOTICE: I DO NOT ACCEPT UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL MESSAGES OF ANY KIND. I CONSIDER SUCH MESSAGES PERSONAL HARRASSMENT AND A GROSS INVASION OF MY PRIVACY. By sending unsolicited commercial advertising/solicitations (or otherwise on or as part of a mailing list) to me via e-mail you will be indicating your consent to paying John R. (Randy) Gobbel $1,000.00 U.S.D./hour for a minimum of 1 hour for my time spent dealing with it. Payment due in 30 days upon receipt of an invoice (e-mail or regular mail) from me or my authorized representative.
