If you want to view it that way, graphics were not html, they were a Mosiac'ism.
Shaya -- Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 9 Sep 1996, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > On Sep 8, 9:27am, Bill Roman wrote: > > Subject: seeking WWW browser (smaller than Netscape) > : > : I've tried Mosaic (2.7 beta), but it's rather dated (no frames, for > : one thing). > > Frames are *not* HTML. They are a Netscape-ism. For information on > the current draft version of the HTML specification (HTML 3.2), check > out > > http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/ > > I agree that Mosaic 2.7b5 is a bit of a problem. The developers > themselves call it "large and hacked". They are working on version > 2.8, which will be a major rewrite and will support the HTML 3.2 spec. > See the comments in the 2.7b5 release notes: > > http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/XMosaic/help-on-version-2.7b5.html#about > > Hope that's of use... > > Chris -)----- > > -- > Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Networking and Telecommunications Services > >
