Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 28 Jun 2005 22:37, Andreas Goesele wrote:
>> What is recommended in a case lake that? Using unpatched kernel.org
>> sources or taking the patched sources from unstable or testing? What
>> are the advantages and disadvantages? Are there other alternatives?
>
> If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The most tested kernels with
> debian software are debian kernels, so if they work, stick with
> them.
Yes. But what if they *are* broken (like the 2.6.8 one). You then
would recommend a Debian kernel over a generic one, even if the Debian
one has to be from a different Debian version (unstable instead of
stable in this case)? Are there no problems to be expected because of
the difference of versions?
Andreas Goesele
--
Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur,
nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Augustinus, De doctrina christiana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
