Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 22.06.2005, 05:57 -0400 schrieb Carl Fink: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:36:35AM +0200, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote: > > > Maybe calling apt "deprecated" was to wrong word, since english is not > > my native language. What I wanted to say: The installation-docs for > > sarge clearly say something like > > "Don't use apt-get anymore. It is not good in resolving dependencies. > > From now on switch to aptitude." > > No they don't. They say "Use aptitude when upgrading from Woody to Sarge." > Nothing about any other situation.
Hm. I think you are wrong: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html " The sarge version of aptitude is the preferred program for package management from console. It has proven to be better at dependency resolution than apt-get. aptitude supports most command line operations of apt-get. " You can find that under "2.1 What's new in the distribution?". It's not about just dist-upgrading. Bye, Ratti -- -o) fontlinge | Fontmanagement for Linux | Schriftenverwaltung in Linux /\\ http://freshmeat.net/projects/fontlinge/ _\_V http://www.gesindel.de https://sourceforge.net/projects/fontlinge/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
