On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:58:48AM -0400, Brian Pack wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 09:51 am, nullman wrote: > > i AM sure, that .. > > > > 1. etch is the currently testing-Branch > > 2. Testing was forked when sarge became stable (not so long ago ;-) > > > > -> so Etch = Sarge + what changed in testing since sarge became stable > > > > When testing (etch) becomes more busy (new packages - > > gnome-transition, ...) it MAY be unstable for a short while .. but > > that was the case in sarge, too before it freezed. > > > > 2005/6/10, Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 15:33, nullman wrote: > > > > isnt etch currently only a very young fork of sarge ? > > > > -> so IT WILL be as stable as sarge the last months ! > > > > > > I'm not sure. Etch is likely to get the latest version of KDE, Gnome, > > > Perl, python... soon which will make it very unstable for a while. > > Then there is the changeover from XFree86 to X.org, which may break *lots* of > stuff. :) Hi Brian, I am using a custom ubuntu-debian x.org from [EMAIL PROTECTED] And if his packages is any indications, the xfree86->xorg transitions should go realativly painlessly. cheers, Kev [0] source list entries deb http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/xorg/ ./ deb-src http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/xorg/ ./ -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
