Lee Braiden wrote: >>SubSection "Display" >> Depth x # and "x" beeing -> 1, 4, 8, 15, 16 or 24. >> (I'd go for >>16, just as pretty, but a faster system.) > > > On this, 16 is good enough for general work, but bear in mind that it can be > inadequate for graphical work. Also, I hear that some cards are actually > faster at 24/32 bit (due to their 32-bit+ architecture, I suppose).
True, very true, but the system he is using is a somewhat aging laptop with a somewhat older ATI board. 16bit would be the better choice i'd say... Later, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
