On Thursday June 9 2005 5:11 pm, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2005 05:26 pm, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > So a top-poster is concerned about him or herself not doing extra
> > work. A bottom-poster is concerned with improving the quality of
> > reading for others.
>
> That's the most self-serving, self-centered, one-sided point of
> view I've read on any tech list in years.  In 3 paragraphs, you
> manage to insult users of proprietary software a number of ways,
> calling them self centered over and over,

That doesn't make him self-serving or self-centered.  Of course it's
one sided:  There's only one side to it (and every other standard
that Microsoft decided to add their own "side" to).  As for
proprietary software users, they do the world a great injustice by
holding back software with economic force.  They do the online
community and business great injustice and are a major source of lost
productivity, lost revenue, and completely superfluous overhead that
raises everybody's prices at the checkstand.  Get your facts
straight.

> Yet, while you are going on and on calling others self-centered,
> you are totally incapable of seeing how "Me! Me! Me!" your point of
> view is.

So far, we've seen plenty of valid arguments in favor of proper
quoting and lots of "but what about my FEEEELINGS?" arguments from
top-posters.  If you want to make a valid argument, please address
these points which top-posters have yet to post any intelligent
rebuttal to:

* Why is top posting not found before Microsoft made it popular?

* How does top posting address filtered or lost messages in a
straightforward manner?  Picking through 200 lines of top-posted crap
to find the one or two lines that gives the new material context does
not address this issue.

* RFC 1855.  What makes your way so much better that it's worth
breaking a 35 year stretch of doing it the right way?

> As long as people follow your rules, they are open
> minded.  People who don't are closed minded.  So does it not occur
> to you that many people think differently than you, so top posting
> may work better for you?

No, people who follow open standards are open minded.  People who
rally against the Right Thing are closed minded.  People who think
Microsoft's way is the only way are closed minded.  Which group are
you in?

--
Paul Johnson
Email and Instant Messenger (Jabber): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ursine.ca/~baloo/

Attachment: pgpH0aPipgrgP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to