David Jardine wrote: > The enormous confusion arising from the release of sarge seems > to have arisen from the use of the words "stable" and "testing".
Not familiar with this enormous confusion. > Somebody who was running stable didn't want woody to be replaced > by sarge without his being asked. Somebody running testing didn't > want to move from sarge to etch automatically. (Sid seems to be > the only stable one.) No, you are describing people who are running woody and sarge and should have those in their sources.list. > Wouldn't things work more smoothly if "stable" and "testing" were > not allowed in /etc/apt/sources.list or anywhere else except as > purely informative descriptions? It would suck, because all my systems that constantly track testing couldn't. The stable release is irellivant, I want these machines to continue to track testing. Just for example. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
