On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:51:44PM -0400, J F wrote: > What is the difference between these two: > xvnc4viewer (1) - VNC viewer for X > xvncviewer (1) - VNC viewer for X
xvnc4viewer supports the version 4.x protocols, including ZRLE encoding which is supposedly on-par with tight encoding, although the tight encoder supports more tweakable options such as JPG compression levels. Stick with ZRLE and xvnc4viewer unless you rely heavily on tightvnc for some reason. Both do a good job, but the RealVNC stuff can reasonably be considered more mainline than tightvnc, ultravnc, tridiavnc, et. al. All of them, of course, support the 3.x encodings of the xvncviewer in Sarge, so aside from performance issues, it's a matter of religious conviction. -- Re-Interpreting Historic Miracles with SED #141: %s/water/wine/g -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
