On 5/11/05, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wish g++ was handled as an alternative too.
Well, since the language is C++, it makes sense that the alternative is called "c++", not "g++". If you do /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --list c++ though, you should see a version of g++. If you really want to call it g++, you could always set your own symlink to c++. Actually, that might already be done. (I'm at work, where I'm using RHEL, so I can't check.) -- Michael A. Marsh http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh http://mamarsh.blogspot.com
