Apparently, _Tim Kelley_, on 04/05/05 07:29,typed: > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:05:01AM +0300, Andres J?rv wrote: > >>I'm missing the point of make-kpkg. It doesn't make any other difference >>than make things more complicated IMHO. I just use the old fashion way of cp >>and make modules_install ;) > > > ? It doesn't take any longer, and you get version tracking and a nice > deb. Seems like a no brainer to me. It's much more convenient than cp > and editing your bootloader files ... >
So how do you tell make-kpkg to not clean everything for a recompilation of a same version kernel with only a tiny change in the config file? Reberto has mentioned 'do_clean := NO' method. Have you ever used it? If not, what you do you use to avoid unnecessary recompilations during tweaking of the config file? ->HS -- Please remove the underscores ( the '_' symbols) from my email address to obtain the correct one. Apologies, but the fudging is to remove spam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
