On Friday 07 Jan 2005 10:39, Carl Fink wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:39:40AM +0000, Peter Nuttall wrote: > > To explain, konqi doesn't support http, kde does. You need a package > > called something like the kdebase-kio-plugins package to get http > > support. > > So why isn't it a dependency? > > > Remember, konqi isn't a web browser. > > Yes it is. What do you mean? > > > PS, why are you using konqi if you don't like kde? > > Because I do like Konqueror. Why is that mysterious?
Sorry, I wrote my reply when both tired and mildly pissed. I note now that 1) kdebase-kio-plugins is a dependency of konqi, and 2) I missed the word "just" out of the sentence "Remember, konqi isn't a web browser" does your problem still exist? Pete PS, The reason I was wondering why you were using konqi and not kde is that konqi drags in a lot of kde stuff, so using it as a stand alone browser uses a lot of memory. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]