On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 11:27 +0000, Jon Dowland wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 10:05 +0000, Jon Dowland wrote: > > > > > >>On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 07:40:53PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote: > >> > >> > >>>The three points I know of why X.Org is better: > >>> > >>> > >>>2. X.Org has real transparency support (I think its called > >>> translucency in this context). > >>> > >>> > >>Eeww.. > >> > >> > > > >They aren't holding electrodes to your privates, making you use > >transparency/translucency. > > > > > That's true. I also understand that it is/was a necessary evil to get > the masses to support X.org.
????? I don't "support" X.org; I use whatever Debian decides to package. OTOH, I do understand why X.org was created (license issues, committers to outsiders). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "The man who has gotten everything he wants is all in favor of peace and order." Jawaharlal Nehru
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
