why not do apt-get install --reinstall gcc3.2 it would download all the dependecies
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 00:19, David A. Cobb wrote: > After five months of struggling ( I had connectivity very briefly before > an "upgrade" make my whole installation useless and sent me back to the > CD's ), it appears that I need to be able to build the nVidia > kernel-patch with _the_same_version_ of gcc that was used to compile my > kernel. I'm using kernel-image-2.4.26, and the nVidia installer reports > this was built with > gcc-3.2. > > OK, I go to install gcc-3.2. Including the Fortran, which I probably > don't really need, I get these complaints from dpkg: > "gcc-3.2 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-9)" > "gcc-3.2 depends on binutils (>= 2.13.90.0.10)" > "g77-3.2 depends on libg2c0;" > "lib.....depends on libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.3-9)" > > Argh, those are not with gcc-3.2. In fact, when I check the download > site (tonight) I find > libgcc1_3.0.4-7_i386.deb from gcc-3.0 > libgcc1_3.3.4-13_hppa.deb -- and NO i386 package from gcc-3.3 > libgcc1_3.3.5-2_hppa.deb -- and NO i386 package from gcc-3.3 > libgcc1_3.4.2-2_i386.deb from gcc-3.4 > libgcc1_4.0-0pre0_i386.deb from gcc-4.0 > libg2c0_3.3.4-13_i386.deb from gcc-3.3 > libg2c0_3.3.5-2_i386.deb from gcc-3.3 > binutils_2.12.90.0.1-4_i386.deb - which I already have and is too low > binutils_2.15-4_i386.deb > > It seems I am stuck dead in the water unless I can come up with a > working gcc-3.2 > compiler to do the nVidia install. > > The alternative looks like trying to recompile my kernel with I compiler > I can get. > > I actually tried that with gcc-3.4 but got errored out immediately. > That is hardly my first choice, so I didn't pursue that further. > > I have gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.0. I had gcc-3.2 but had to remove it because > I couldn't get 3.3 or 3.4 to coexist. I don't really want to give away > space to five or six different generations of compiler. One, maybe two, > but not this fiasco. > > Where can I go to get the missing libs?? [ backports is also no help in > this ]. > > Anyway, why is gcc-3.2 on the download site so incomplete? > > I also couldn't get 3.3 up and flying for very similar reasons - key > libs missing - but what I need is 3.2! > > -- > David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate > "By God's Grace, I am a Christian man; by my actions a great sinner." -- > The Way of a Pilgrim: R.French, Tr. Life is too short to tolerate crappy > software! -- Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
