On Wednesday 17 November 2004 08:06, Bob wrote: > Hello list, I've read the section in the install manual about > recommended partitioning schemes, but thought I would also see what the > collective wisdom has to say on the matter.
Well, if you are going to have all these filesystems on the same set of drive spindles, there really isn't any use to carving up /usr and everything else at all. Separating filesystems mainly gives the advantage of using different mount options for each filesystem; such as mounting /var "noexec" and /usr "read only". putting /var on a separate filesystem is almost always a good idea, since it is so active; but on a different set of drives is the best idea. putting /usr on a part by itself allows read only mounting if that gets you off. Of course installing software requires an extra step. In debian most all of the server packages will have most of their data in /var (apache, mysql, postgresql, and so forth). If it's a file server then /srv (or /export) separate would be a good idea as well. Really it depends on the machines purpose and what's running on it. If your /home is nfs mounted, of course you have no use for a separate /home, do you? RAID 10 is a huge money waster as well, only in the most extreme situations would I use it. RAID 5 is fine for four drives. If real time redundancy is not that important, you may consider a non-raid setup. It depends on what you are running and what you intend to do with it. Partitioning schemes don't exist in a vacuum; what makes sense for one machine may be utterly stupid for another. -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ ( t | i | m | @ | i | t | . | k | p | t | . | c | c ) \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ GPG key fingerprint = 1DEE CD9B 4808 F608 FBBF DC21 2807 D7D3 09CA 85BF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
