--- Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:21:54 +0000 (GMT), Thomas Adam > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can see no advantages to using aptitude over apt-get. > > If I'm not mistaken, d-i uses aptitude (or maybe its a cut-down fork > or something). If a user installs using the new d-i, opts for manual > package configuration, is it impossible to avoid using aptitude?
Who cares? Although, if aptitude is being used as a "replacement" for apt-get, a bug report should be filed against it. Making those sorts of descisions are best left to the user. -- Thomas Adam ===== "The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net "TAG Editor" -- http://linuxgazette.net "<shrug> We'll just save up your sins, Thomas, and punish you for all of them at once when you get better. The experience will probably kill you. :)" -- Benjamin A. Okopnik (Linux Gazette Technical Editor) ___________________________________________________________ Moving house? Beach bar in Thailand? New Wardrobe? Win £10k with Yahoo! Mail to make your dream a reality. Get Yahoo! Mail www.yahoo.co.uk/10k -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
