Actually, if you installed with Woody and afterwards change sources list to testing, everything would go mad.
So just use sarge to install if that's what finally you like to use. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thierry Michalowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:58 PM Subject: Going to install testing: should I use sarge or woody installer? > Hi , > > I'm going to install a new machine on Debian, and I will surely follow > testing, as I've been used to for years. > > Nevertheless, installing a new machine with woody today, just to upgrade > it to testing (and I do want a 2.6 linux kernel!) looks cumbersome. > The question is : should I nevertheless proceed with a woody > installation CD , manually change my sources.list and apt-get > dist-upgrade at will ? > Or should I use the sarge-rc1 CD install ? > > Related question : if I use sarge-rc1 to install, will apt get > automatically configured to follow testing ? > Or, when sarge will become stable, would I have to take care of changing > my apt config if there happened a requirement to stick to stable afterwards? > > I realize my questions may look awkward but I simply can't wait for > sarge to be "stable" unless it happens whithin the next 2 weeks. > > Thanks in advance! > Thierry > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
