Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ash is supposed to be POSIX compliant, and according to the package > description it makes a better /bin/sh because it is smaller. However > I beleive there are some Bourne shell features not present in ash (I > don't have a reference for that, it's from memory which may be > faulty).
Please don't spread FUD. I certainly am not aware of any missing features relevant for shell scripts. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
