On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 23:44:14 +0200 (METDST) Sebastiaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Chris Metzler wrote: > > <snip> > > e) get a video card that's better at 3D stuff. When I switched from > > the Matrox G550 to an nVidia GF4 Ti4600, my framerates flying around > > downtown SF jumped from ~6 to ~17. This is especially worth > > considering for Matrox cards, given that they're tuned for excellent > > 2D performance, and don't have very good 3D performance at all. Plus, > > Matrox doesn't seem to be making much of an effort to maintain their > > Linux drivers, the DRI project doesn't seem to be doing much with the > > Matrox DRI drivers, etc. > > > > Can you tell me which FPS you get with glxgears? I have the same card > (more or less), but I get stuck at 200 fps.
Um, I suspect you've got something configured weird . While it's
important to remember that glxgears is not a good way to predict 3D
performance in any real app, I typically do a lot better than that,
e.g.:
stax:~-712> glxgears
17748 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3549.600 FPS
20368 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4073.600 FPS
20381 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4076.200 FPS
20452 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4090.400 FPS
19829 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3965.800 FPS
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgpvBqfJ35J8N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
