-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 11:09, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:59:03AM -0500, Michael Satterwhite insinuated: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I just received a direct reply to my (OK, I'll admit it: near > > desperate) appeal for help with gcc. I want to thank Greg Folkert > > for trying to help me with this. > > > > The problem is that he tells me that 2 other people have responded, > > but I haven't seen *ANY* replies yet. My last appeal just came in. I > > know that the list is slow right now - it took two hours for my > > message to get back to me. My worry is why I haven't seen the > > replies. > > > > I have no doubt that the list admin will get the problem fixed, but > > I was wondering if anyone else has noticed that they may have missed > > messages? The vagueries of list processing may be part of it (I've > > seen replies to messages arrive before I get the message asking the > > question), but I really don't like looking as if I've ignored what > > was probably very good help. > > check the archives online? that's what i've been doing as i'm > impatiently waiting for replies to mine :)
Doh! Of course! There are archives, aren't there. I hate it when I forget something this obvious! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBJiuSjeziQOokQnARAp4nAJ9djM9wFdpwjlSETUJ+TrUK5wtazQCfdH9z eq0A0ylXmHn3MGr8SXRnSg0= =Pf51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
