On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 08:01, Roel Schroeven wrote: > Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 20, Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Unfortunately, linux.* is not a bidrectional gateway, so the posts > > Fortunatly, linux.* *IS* a bidirectional gateway, unless your news > > server is misconfigured. > Are you sure? This is the first time I've seen anyone saying it is > bidirectional. I've seen many people say that it is unidirectional, and > experimential evidence tends to confirm that. After all the shenanigans of the past week, I've convinced the usenet mirror (is that an accurate term here?) on Verizon is unidirectional. Nothing I've posted there has made the list proper, nor the web archives.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
