csj([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On 8. August 2004 at 2:19PM -0400, > Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Otto Wyss([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > > > I am trying to use cdrecord to make a cd. But it seemingly > > > > hangs (forever). It outputs the information below and then > > > > suspends (and ctrl C does not kill it). > > > > > > > Use > > > > > > cdrecord --scanbus dev=ATAPI > > > > > > and then burn it with the gotten numbers > > > > > > cdrecord dev=ATAPI:x,x,x > > > > > I had a problem using "dev=ATAPI:x,x,x" when I first switched > > to the 2.6.x kernel and dropping ide-scsi. I finally settled > > on dev=/dev/hdc. So I just tried the above to see if something > > had changed, since I am now running kernel 2.6.7. > > The better way to burn a cd's under the new interface is > > cdrecord dev=ATA:x,x,x > > where x,x,x is returned by: > > cdrecord --scanbus dev=ATA > > I myself am confused over the difference between dev=ATA and > dev=ATAPI. AFAIK dev=ATA:x,x,x gives you DMA, while > dev=ATAPI,x,x,x doesn't. This is with the unstable version of > cdrecord. dev=ATA is probably equivalent to dev=/dev/hdX.
Interesting. It seems that --scanbus dev=ATA does report the CDRW & CDROM as different devices, 1,0,0 and 1,1,0 wheras ATAPI reports them as 0,0,0 & 0,1,0. cdrecord speed=10 dev=ATA:1,0,0 blank=fast with -- Warning: Using badly designed ATAPI via /dev/hd* interface. cdrecord speed=10 dev=/dev/hdc blank=fast with -- Warning: Open by 'devname' is unintentional and not supported. but both blank the CD while ATAPI:0,0,0 does not. This means more testing on my part but thanks for mentioning the ATA:x,x,x. I don't recall reading/hearing about that before. Wayne -- In English, every word can be verbed. Would that it were so in our programming languages. _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
